Professor Perjés Géza was comparing the ancient Romans’ Limes and the chain of castles on the Hungarian Frontier…
Comparing the two systems, Hungarian historian Perjés Géza has come to the conclusion, that the Hungarian defense system in the 16-17th centuries had a harder task than the Romans’ in the 2nd Century A.D.
(My note: not as if the two systems can be historically compared in a sense that which was “better”. I think the Professor could not find another equally long defensive line because the Borderland was quite “matchless”.)
Professor Perjés says:
„Let me tell you some data to prove why the defense of the Roman Limes against the barbarians was a tough job.
The length of the Limes built against the Germans used to be 500 km long in the 1st-2nd century A.D.
This line was guarded by 15-25,000 auxiliary forces and 8 legions which meant 45-55,000 professional soldiers. Altogether there were about 70,000 on guard.
The length of the Hungarian Borderland’s chain of castles was about 1,200 km from the Adriatic Sea to the Tisza River.
(My note: and the Transylvanian part of the Borderland is not even included but it was part of this frontier, nevertheless, with a similar small war going on, regardless of the fact that Transylvania was regarded as a (semi)-vassal of the Ottoman Empire.)
In the Frontier castles, there were 15-20,000 settled border-guards who were either Wallachians or Hajdu soldiers, additionally, the local lords had about 20,000 settled warriors. The king paid only 15-20,000 soldiers in the Borderland castles.
(My note: half of the Borderland castles were owned by the local noblemen.)
So, there were altogether about 60,000 soldiers available.
If we regard the rates, 140 Roman soldiers were guarding one kilometer while there were only 50 soldiers guarding the same distance in the Borderland. This rate is even more disadvantageous if we take it into consideration that the soldiers in the 8 legions were professional soldiers while there were usually no such trained soldiers taking part in guarding the Borderland in Hungary.
Besides, the Roman Limes was a structure built of continuous walls and trenches with ditches and watchtowers while the castles and the watchtowers of the Borderland were not connected like this.”
How could the defense be effective enough for so many years? The system was built out at the beginning of the 15th century and we know how successful it was if we take a look at the Siege of Nándorfehérvár (Belgrade) in 1456 when the assault of the sultan who had taken Constantinapolis was repelled. After the collapse of the first Borderland system in the south after 1522, and in earnest, after 1541, the chain of „frontier houses” (forts) has been working very successfully until 1699.
Why were they better than the structures of the ancient Limes which had been guarded by more numerous and more experienced Roman troops? There was a saying among the warriors of the Valiant Order, the defenders of the Borderland: „A castle can be defended only in the field.”
According to Perjés Géza, the Ottoman attackers have always been in a better position as they could concentrate a great number of soldiers at any point in the defense line. At the same time, the defenders were always scattered in several castles and as a result of this, they were weaker. He says that constant defensive warfare is doomed and it can be only successful if the defenders keep attacking the enemy. (Please note, that I am using the Eastern name order for Hungarian names.)
In the Hungarian and Croatian Borderland castles, the rate of cavalry and infantry was 1:1 because speed and mobility were the most important elements of their tactics, not to mention their very high quality of martial art with their weapons.
According to Klaniczay Tibor, this 16-17th-century Borderland defense system can be considered as a „Hungaricum”, an outstanding structure in Europe in its age. He adds, that the existence of the Valiant Order is also a special development of Hungarian history: their society is quite matchless in contemporary Europe, although there were similar societies of soldiers facing the Ottomans or the Tatars on the edges of Eastern Europe.
As for Poland and Ukraine, the defensive fights were rather far away from the heart of the country, a bit isolated from the entire society while the Hungarian Borderland literally cut the country into several parts in the middle of the kingdom. The whole society felt the presence of the Ottoman peril.
My note: there were some desperate Habsburg plans in the 1570s which wanted to scorch the land and destroy the whole frontier zone just to make it harder to pass for the Ottoman raiders who sometimes rode as far as the northern fringe of Royal Hungary. Luckily, the Hungarian Estates dissuaded the monarch from this plan. The zone between the Turks and the Hungarians was very wide and many people lived there who paid taxes to both sides.
Since the Roman times, Hungary, more particularly the Bend of the Danube has always been a frequently visited gate where the barbarians and the other Eastern tribes arrived to enter and invade the western lands. But it was just a destination: the „highway of nations” was the steppes of South-Ukraine and the Moldavian lands even in the 16th century.
There was a wide area that isolated this highway from the Ottoman Empire. It was totally uninhabited and the Ottomans wanted to settle several Tatar tribes there so as to extend their range of influence. It can be said that this area became a kind of political and cultural border as well.
Historians toy with the idea that a lengthy Frontier could be drawn on the map, all along the borders of Eastern Europe which was surrounding and defending entire Central Europe.
The Hungarian Borderland was connected to a similar Croatian system called „čosjstvo i junštvo” and there was a similar Frontier in Poland, the „swiat kreswy”.
On the Eastern fringe of Europe, on the steppes, new settlements were established in the 1570s. These settlements were located very far away from each other but many of them became agricultural fortified towns where the population was increasing, due to the Tatar and Nogai settlers and we haven’t spoken of the Cossacks yet…
In Royal Hungary, we can see clearly how the Habsburg administration and the ruler relied on the support of the Hungarian Estates due to the constant Ottoman threat. It would have been insane of the Habsburgs to bring the war to Austria.
And vica-versa: the Hungarian lords could not have defended the remaining kingdom on their own, without the financial and military aid of the Habsburg Empire. At the same time, the well-built Borderland system was effectively blocking the daily waves of Ottoman attacks that wanted badly to plunder and raid the rich Austrian lands.
It was the reason why the Habsburgs mostly allowed the survival of the Hungarian institutions’ administration of the Estates. The Hungarian Diet was working, the system of Counties was operating on, the main traditional ranks were granted to Hungarians (like the rank of Palatine who was in charge of the country in the absence of the king).
In theory, the Hungarian Chancellery and the Hungarian Chamber were independent bodies but in fact, they were instructed by the central office of the king from Vienna. The Hungarian Estates were insisting on keeping the old Hungarian constitution and their privileges intact but they had to cede the financial, military, and foreign political affairs to the Habsburgs in exchange for organizing the defense together against the Ottoman Empire.
Moreover, very few of the Estates were given high posts in the central governing institutions of the king.”
According to Professor Perjés, major changes took place in the Hungarian defense-system after 1526:
„The most profound changes happened about the administration of military issues and in technical questions. Comparing to the late medieval age, the situation of military command at the end of the 16th century has significantly changed.
This change was observed in many European war zones but it was strikingly visible in Hungary as it was becoming one of the greatest battlefields of Europe.
For example, we can trace this change in the newly formed northern castle system’s 100-120 forts whereas there were three times more soldiers serving in the second part of the 16th century than in the southern castle chain before 1526. There were about 20,000 men paid by the king while there were just 7-8,000 soldiers before 1526.
The number of this standing army is remarkably high, even by contemporary European standards. Neither the Spanish Habsburgs, the Venetians in Dalmatia, the Polish nor the 17th-century Russians kept together such a large army against the Ottomans for such a long time, not to mention the length of the castle chain.”
(Source: Szerecz Miklós, Klaniczay Tibor, and Perjés Géza, translation and a few additions: Szántai Gábor)
You can support my work if you happen to click on an Amazon advertisement in my article and end up buying anything: then, Amazon would give me 1-2% of your purchase. At least they said so. Thank you very much.)